Naranjo v. Nusenda Credit Union
| Gerald Naranjo |
| Nusenda Credit Union |
| 2:2018cv12977 |
| September 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Laurie J Michelson |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Nusenda Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1) (Nichol, Courtney) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER STRIKING #7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is stricken for failure to fully comply with E.D. Mich. LR 7.1. Plaintiff's counsel is to have a telephonic meet and confer with Defense counsel no later than November 16, 2018 to discuss the relief requested in the motion. If concurrence is denied following a meaningful discussion, or if Plaintiff's counsel fail to make themselves available, the motion may be re-filed. Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (WBar)
|
| Filing 7 (STRICKEN) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Nusenda Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1) (Nichol, Courtney) Modified on 11/15/2018 (WBar). |
|
Filing 6
STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time for Defendant to Answer #1 Complaint, ( Responsive Pleading due by 11/13/2018,) Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (WBar)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Courtney A. Nichol on behalf of Nusenda Credit Union. (Nichol, Courtney) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Nusenda Credit Union* (DWor) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DWor) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick G. Gagniuk on behalf of Gerald Naranjo. (Gagniuk, Patrick) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Larry P. Smith on behalf of Gerald Naranjo. (Smith, Larry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Gerald Naranjo against Nusenda Credit Union with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-6915758 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Lapeer County - County Where Action Arose: Lapeer County - County of 1st Defendant: out of state. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Marco, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Naranjo v. Nusenda Credit Union | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gerald Naranjo | |
| Represented By: | Larry P. Smith |
| Represented By: | Patrick G. Gagniuk |
| Represented By: | David M. Marco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nusenda Credit Union | |
| Represented By: | Courtney A. Nichol |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
