PI Tower Development LLC v. Chesterfield, Charter Township of
Plaintiff: PI Tower Development LLC
Defendant: Chesterfield, Charter Township of
Case Number: 4:2020cv12280
Filed: August 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Matthew F Leitman
Referring Judge: R Steven Whalen
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas J. McGraw on behalf of Chesterfield, Charter Township of. (McGraw, Thomas)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas D. Landa on behalf of All Defendants. (Landa, Thomas)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Christine D. Anderson appearing on behalf of Chesterfield, Charter Township of (Anderson, Christine)
September 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Chesterfield, Charter Township of waiver sent on 9/2/2020, answer due 11/2/2020. (Sheaffer, David)
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Richard E. Rassel, III appearing on behalf of PI Tower Development LLC (Rassel, Richard)
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Chesterfield, Charter Township of* (SKra)
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra)
August 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by PI Tower Development LLC against Chesterfield, Charter Township of. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8002050 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Macomb - County of 1st Defendant: Macomb. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits List of Exhibits to Complaint, #2 Exhibit A) Lease Agreement, #3 Exhibit B) SLU App and Site Plan, #4 Exhibit C) Meeting Transcript, #5 Exhibit D) Tower Ordinance, #6 Exhibit E) PC Meeting Minutes, #7 Exhibit F) PC Meeting Minutes, #8 Exhibit G) ZBA Appeal Rider, #9 Exhibit H) ZBA Meeting Minutes, #10 Exhibit I) Initial Due Diligence Period) (Sheaffer, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PI Tower Development LLC v. Chesterfield, Charter Township of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PI Tower Development LLC
Represented By: David Robert Sheaffer
Represented By: Richard E. Rassel, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chesterfield, Charter Township of
Represented By: Thomas D. Landa
Represented By: Thomas J. McGraw
Represented By: Christine D. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?