RFA Brands, LLC v. Consensus Holdings, LLC et al
Plaintiff: RFA Brands, LLC
Defendant: Consensus Holdings, LLC and Noah Bender
Case Number: 4:2020cv12833
Filed: October 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Matthew F Leitman
Referring Judge: Anthony P Patti
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STIPULATED ORDER Extending Deadline to Answer #1 Complaint. Response due by 12/22/2020. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
November 19, 2020 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Noah Bender served on 11/12/2020, answer due 12/3/2020. (Carswell, Chanille)
November 19, 2020 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Consensus Holdings, LLC served on 11/12/2020, answer due 12/3/2020. (Carswell, Chanille)
November 3, 2020 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Consensus Holdings, LLC served on 10/29/2020, answer due 11/19/2020. (Carswell, Chanille)
October 26, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Chanille Carswell on behalf of RFA Brands, LLC. (Carswell, Chanille)
October 23, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Marc Lorelli on behalf of RFA Brands, LLC. (Lorelli, Marc)
October 23, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued for *Noah Bender* (LGra)
October 23, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Consensus Holdings, LLC* (LGra)
October 23, 2020 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra)
October 22, 2020 Filing 3 Trademark Report Sent To Washington (Cantor, Mark)
October 22, 2020 Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by RFA Brands, LLC (Cantor, Mark)
October 22, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by RFA Brands, LLC against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8122393 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4020528) (Cantor, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RFA Brands, LLC v. Consensus Holdings, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RFA Brands, LLC
Represented By: Mark A. Cantor
Represented By: Marc Lorelli
Represented By: Chanille Carswell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Consensus Holdings, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Noah Bender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?