Business Agriculture Guild v. Pinnacle Business Group, Inc. et al
Business Agriculture Guild |
Pinnacle Business Group, Inc. Doing business as Enterprise Architecture Center of Excellence Doing business as BARNETT DATA SYSTEMS Doing business as ZACHMAN INSTITUTE FOR FRAMEWORK ADVANCEMENT Doing business as ZIFA also known as BUSINESS ARCHITECTU, BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE CENTER OF EXCELLENCE and Samuel Holcman |
4:2021cv10473 |
March 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Kimberly G Altman |
Matthew F Leitman |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Pinnacle Business Group, Inc.* (SKra) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Samuel Holcman* (SKra) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra) |
Filing 2 REPORT ON THE FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR TRADEMARK REPORT by Business Agriculture Guild (Kerry, Matthew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8365427 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Statement of Disclosure) (Kerry, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Business Agriculture Guild v. Pinnacle Business Group, Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Pinnacle Business Group, Inc. Doing business as Enterprise Architecture Center of Excellence Doing business as BARNETT DATA SYSTEMS Doing business as ZACHMAN INSTITUTE FOR FRAMEWORK ADVANCEMENT Doing business as ZIFA also known as BUSINESS ARCHITECTU | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE CENTER OF EXCELLENCE | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Samuel Holcman | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Business Agriculture Guild | |
Represented By: | Matthew Kerry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.