Calkins v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Amanda Calkins
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A. and Equifax Information Services, LLC
Case Number: 4:2021cv11268
Filed: May 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Matthew F Leitman
Referring Judge: Elizabeth A Stafford
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER to Attend Telephonic Scheduling Conference and Notice of Requirements for Submission of Discovery Plan. (TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference set for 8/17/2021 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. **PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR IMPORTANT DEADLINE AND CALL-IN INFORMATION**) Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
July 13, 2021 Filing 5 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Equifax Information Services, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Bolton, Jordan)
July 13, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Bolton, Jordan)
July 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STIPULATED ORDER Extending Bank of America, N.A.'s Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Notice of Removal. Response due by 8/6/2021. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STIPULATED ORDER Extending Bank of America, N.A.'s Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Notice of Removal. Response due by 7/5/2021. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
May 27, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Bank of America, N.A. from 53rd District Court for the County of Livingston, case number 21-0783-GC. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8480672 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint in State Court Action, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Removal for filing in State Court Action) (Rheaume, Thomas)
May 27, 2021 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Calkins v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Represented By: Thomas J. Rheaume, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC
Represented By: Jordan S. Bolton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Calkins
Represented By: Carl Schwartz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?