Rahaman v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company
| Joy Rahaman and Joy Rahaman [E-filer] |
| State Farm Mutual Insurance Company |
| 4:2022cv10635 |
| March 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| P.I.: Other |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
REPLY to Response re #15 MOTION to Consolidate Cases Under Rule 42 filed by All Defendants. (Sims, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 17
RESPONSE to #15 MOTION to Consolidate Cases Under Rule 42 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE filed by Joy Rahaman [E-filer]. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email State Farm and AFC, #2 Exhibit AFC filed motion) (Rahaman [E-filer], Joy)
|
|
Filing 16
OBJECTION to #14 Memorandum Opinion & Order OBJECTIONS TO OPINION AND ORDER by Joy Rahaman [E-filer]. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits) (Rahaman [E-filer], Joy)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to Consolidate Cases Under Rule 42 by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - 2016 Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B - Complaint - SF) (Sims, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 14
OPINION and ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Strike and Striking Plaintiff's Reply (ECF Nos. #9 , #12 , #13 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford. (MarW)
|
|
Filing 13
[STRICKEN] REPLY to Response re #9 MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT ANSWERS AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES EXHIBIT # 5 filed by Joy Rahaman [E-filer]. (Rahaman [E-filer], Joy) Modified on 5/5/2022 (SKra).[WRONG EVENT USED- EXHIBIT TO REPLY DE#12] Modified on 5/5/2022 (MarW).
|
|
Filing 12
[STRICKEN] REPLY to Response re #9 MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT ANSWERS AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES filed by Joy Rahaman [E-filer]. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Motion to Strike) (Rahaman [E-filer], Joy) Modified on 5/5/2022 (MarW).
|
|
Filing 11
RESPONSE to #9 MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT ANSWERS AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES filed by State Farm Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Index, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (Berlin, Cary)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford: #9 MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT ANSWERS AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES filed by Joy Rahaman [E-filer]. Signed by District Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis. (RLou)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: Telephonic Scheduling Conference on 5/27/2022 is Cancelled. (RLou)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT ANSWERS AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Joy Rahaman [E-filer]. (Rahaman [E-filer], Joy)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Scheduling Conference set for 5/27/2022 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis (RLou)
|
|
Filing 7
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by State Farm Mutual Insurance Company (Berlin, Cary)
|
|
Filing 6
ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by State Farm Mutual Insurance Company. (Berlin, Cary)
|
|
Filing 4
Pro Se E-filer Electronic Account Renewal Form submitted by Joy Rahaman. (LHos)
|
|
Pro Se E-filing Access Given to Joy Rahaman [E-filer]. (LHos)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company served on 3/28/2022, answer due 4/18/2022. (NAhm)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS Issued for *State Farm Mutual Insurance Company* (DPer)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Joy Rahaman against State Farm Mutual Insurance Company; Receipt No: DET 140037 - Fee: $ 402. (DPer)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
