Roll v. Flagstar Bancorp Inc.
Plaintiff: Danny Roll
Defendant: Flagstar Bancorp Inc. and Flagstar Bank, FSB
Petitioner: Philip Angus
Case Number: 4:2022cv11502
Filed: July 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Referring Judge: Kimberly G Altman
2 Judge: Mark A Goldsmith
3 Judge: Shalina D Kumar
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith and Magistrate Judge David R. Grand in Detroit to District Judge Shalina D. Kumar and Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman in Flint. (SSch)
July 6, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE by Philip Angus of Motion to Consolidate Cases (Yanchunis, John)
July 6, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Flagstar Bank, FSB* (LHos)
July 6, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Flagstar Bancorp Inc.* (LHos)
July 6, 2022 Addition of Parties to CM/ECF: Plaintiff Danny Roll, Defendant Flagstar Bank, FSB. Reason: The party was not added to CM/ECF when e-filing #1 Complaint,, Plaintiff requests summons issued. (Friedman, Bradley)
July 6, 2022 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LHos)
July 5, 2022 NOTICE of Error re #1 Complaint,,. Parties listed on the initiating document were omitted. The filing attorney must use the docket event Addition of Parties to correct the error. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (TTho)
July 1, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8965957 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Marquette - County Where Action Arose: Marquette - County of 1st Defendant: Troy. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Friedman, Bradley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roll v. Flagstar Bancorp Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Flagstar Bancorp Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Flagstar Bank, FSB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danny Roll
Represented By: Bradley J. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Philip Angus
Represented By: John Yanchunis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?