Hatton et al v. Presidio, Inc. et al
| David Hatton, Ryan Heidenreich and People Driven Technology, Inc. |
| Presidio, Inc., Presidio Networked Solutions LLC and Presidio Networked Solutions Group, LLC |
| 4:2022cv11564 |
| July 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| Terrence G Berg |
| Shalina D Kumar |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MOTION to Transfer Case by Presidio Networked Solutions Group, LLC, Presidio Networked Solutions LLC, Presidio, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - David Hatton Offer Letter, #3 Exhibit 2 - Ryan Heidenreich Offer Letter, #4 Exhibit 3 - Complaint (Ohio Action)) (Cronkhite, R.J.)
|
|
Filing 14
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Presidio Networked Solutions LLC (Cronkhite, R.J.)
|
|
Filing 13
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Presidio Networked Solutions Group, LLC (Cronkhite, R.J.)
|
|
Filing 12
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Presidio, Inc. (Cronkhite, R.J.)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by R.J. Cronkhite on behalf of Presidio Networked Solutions Group, LLC, Presidio Networked Solutions LLC, Presidio, Inc.. (Cronkhite, R.J.)
|
|
Filing 10
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Presidio Networked Solutions Group, LLC waiver sent on 7/28/2022, answer due 9/26/2022. (Portinga, D.)
|
|
Filing 9
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Presidio Networked Solutions LLC waiver sent on 7/27/2022, answer due 9/26/2022. (Portinga, D.)
|
|
Filing 8
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Presidio, Inc. waiver sent on 7/28/2022, answer due 9/26/2022. (Portinga, D.)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Terrence G. Berg and Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti in Detroit to District Judge Shalina D. Kumar and Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman in Flint. (NAhm)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Issued for *Presidio, Inc.* (DAll)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Issued for *Presidio Networked Solutions LLC* (DAll)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Issued for *Presidio Networked Solutions Group, LLC* (DAll)
|
|
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: James R. Peterson appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Peterson, James)
|
|
Filing 2
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by People Driven Technology, Inc. (Portinga, D.)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by David Hatton, People Driven Technology, Inc., Ryan Heidenreich against Presidio Networked Solutions Group, LLC, Presidio Networked Solutions LLC, Presidio, Inc.. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8974689 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Kent County - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): US District Court Eastern District of Michigan, 4:22-cv-10098, Judge Shalina D. Kumar] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F) (Portinga, D.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
