Johnson v. DeWine et al
| Robert W. Johnson |
| Mike DeWine, Lori Barreras, J. Rita Mcneil Danish, William Patmon, III, Charlie Winburn, Madhu Singh, Angela Phelps-White, Keith Anderson and Warren County Sheriff's Office |
| 4:2022cv12083 |
| September 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Jonathan JC Grey |
| Shalina D Kumar |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from Michigan Eastern has been opened in Southern District of Ohio as case 1:22-cv-00587, filed 10/12/2022. (VLun) |
| Case transferred to Southern District of Ohio. (VLun) |
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #6 Order Transferring Case Outside the State of Michigan on Robert W. Johnson, 112 Court Street, Apt 2, Watertown, NY 13601 (THal) |
Filing 6
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Southern District of Ohio Western Division. Signed by District Judge Shalina D. Kumar. (NAhm)
|
| Filing 5 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for a change of venue due to conflicts of interests by Robert W. Johnson. (LHos) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Robert W. Johnson. (LHos) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Robert W. Johnson against All Defendants (LHos) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
