Coates v. Doyle et al
Plaintiff: DAIVON COATES
Defendant: SHANNON ANN DOYLE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, US Postal Service and Jennifer Ann Doyle
Case Number: 4:2023cv10057
Filed: January 9, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Jonathan JC Grey
Referring Judge: Shalina D Kumar
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 23 U.S.C. ยง 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued for *Jennifer Ann Doyle* (KBro)
March 7, 2023 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Daivon Coates against All Defendants. NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Siddique, Amina)
March 7, 2023 REQUEST for THIRD-PARTY SUMMONS for JENNIFER ANN DOYLE. (Siddique, Amina)
January 10, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS Re Issued for *US Postal Service* (NAhm)
January 10, 2023 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for the United States Attorney and the Office of the Attorney General. (NAhm)
January 10, 2023 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE* (NAhm)
January 10, 2023 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *SHANNON ANN DOYLE* (NAhm)
January 10, 2023 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm)
January 9, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by DAIVON COATES against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9189389 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: MACOMB - County Where Action Arose: MACOMB - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, 2021-2468-NF, Judge RICHARD L. CARETTI] (Siddique, Amina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coates v. Doyle et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAIVON COATES
Represented By: Amina Siddique
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHANNON ANN DOYLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jennifer Ann Doyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?