Hayes v. Hemingway
| James G. Hayes |
| United States of America and Jonathan Hemingway |
| 4:2023cv10312 |
| February 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Shalina D Kumar |
| Patricia T Morris |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 02 U.S.C. ยง 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce C |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ADDENDUM re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by James G. Hayes (TTho)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by James G. Hayes. (TTho)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER Requiring Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Attached Petition has been electronically served on the Office of the United States Attorney. Response due by 4/28/2023 Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (Attachments: #1 Habeas Petition) (TTho)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Amending Case Caption. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (TTho)
|
|
FILING FEE Received in the amount of 5.00 by James G. Hayes - Receipt No. 150003958 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (BHan)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James G. Hayes against United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Civil Cover Sheet) (LGra)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
