Kriegsmann v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. et al
Mellisa Kriegsmann |
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., THE ART OF DERMATOLOGY, PLLC and Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. |
4:2023cv11280 |
May 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Shalina D Kumar |
Anthony P Patti |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mellisa Kriegsmann (Schwartz, Carl) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Mellisa Kriegsmann waiver sent on 6/8/2022, answer due 8/7/2022. (Schwartz, Carl) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *The Art of Dermatology, PLLC * (DAll) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.* (DAll) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mellisa Kriegsmann against CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., THE ART OF DERMATOLOGY, PLLC with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: CMIEDC-9367651 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Schwartz, Carl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.