Harvey et al v. Citi Group Mortgage et al
Eric Harvey and Lela McGee-Harvey |
Citi Group Mortgage, Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC and Trott Law Firm |
4:2024cv10073 |
January 10, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Kimberly G Altman |
F Kay Behm |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Emergency MOTION for a Continuance by Eric Harvey and Lela McGee-Harvey. (SSch) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #8 Stipulation and Order, Add and Terminate Parties by Trott Law Firm (Bayliss, Aaron) |
Filing 8 STIPULATED ORDER to dismiss defendant Trott Law, P.C. with prejudice. Signed by District Judge F. Kay Behm. (DPer) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM by Eric Harvey, Lela McGee-Harvey (DPer) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron F Bayliss on behalf of Trott Law Firm. (Bayliss, Aaron) |
Filing 5 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (MCho) |
Filing 4 Summonses Provided to Plaintiff(s) for Service (DAll) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Citi Group Mortgage, Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC, Trott Law Firm* (DAll) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Eric Harvey, Lela McGee-Harvey against Citi Group Mortgage, Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC, Trott Law Firm Receipt No: 150008593 - Fee: $ 405. (DAll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.