Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System v. General Motors Company et al
Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System |
General Motors Company, Mary T. Barra and Paul A. Jacobson |
4:2024cv10182 |
January 24, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Curtis Ivy |
Shalina D Kumar |
Linda V Parker |
Elizabeth A Stafford |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Notice to Parties Regarding Consolidated Case: Order of consolidation entered on *02/28/24*. Designated lead case number is *23-13132*. (DPer) |
Filing 13 ORDER for consolidation, appointment as lead plainitff, and approval of selection of lead counsel. Signed by District Judge Shalina D. Kumar. (DPer) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Cynthia J. Billings on behalf of Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System. (Billings, Cynthia) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Matthew I. Henzi appearing on behalf of Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System (Henzi, Matthew) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to #4 MOTION to Consolidate Cases , for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and MOTION to Appoint Counsel , Memorandum in Further Support filed by Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System. (McConville, Francis) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION AND ORDER Confirming Service of Process and Extending Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by District Judge Shalina D. Kumar. [Refer to image for deadlines]. (THal) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Roger P. Meyers on behalf of All Defendants. (Meyers, Roger) |
Filing 7 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by General Motors Company (Douglas, Stephanie) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie A. Douglas on behalf of All Defendants. (Douglas, Stephanie) |
Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Linda V. Parker and Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr in Detroit to District Judge Shalina D. Kumar and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford in Flint. (SSch) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Consolidate Cases , for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and, MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Certification, #3 Exhibit B - Loss Analysis, #4 Exhibit C - Notice - Shamoon Action, #5 Exhibit D - Notice - Hollywood Police Action, #6 Exhibit E - Labaton Firm Resume) (McConville, Francis) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Mary T. Barra, General Motors Company, Paul A. Jacobson* (DJen) |
Filing 2 ADDENDUM re #1 Complaint,, Civil Cover Sheet by City of Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement (McConville, Francis) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by City of Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement against Mary T. Barra, General Motors Company, Paul A. Jacobson with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9634357 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Wayne County - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne County. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): Eastern District of Michigan, 2:23-cv-13132, Judge Hon. Shalina D. Kumar] (McConville, Francis) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DJen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.