Petersmark v. King
| Joseph Petersmark |
| C. King and Chris King |
| 4:2024cv11139 |
| April 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| F Kay Behm |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER Requiring Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Attached Petition has been electronically served on the Michigan Attorney General and the Michigan Department of Corrections. Response due by 12/10/2024 Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus) (DJen)
|
|
Filing 6
Order Amending Case Caption. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (DJen)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (DJen)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Joseph Petersmark. (LGra)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Joseph Petersmark. (NAhm)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (MSyl)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Joseph Petersmark. (JHea)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Joseph Petersmark against C. King. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (JHea)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
