Macon v. Davis
Case Number: 5:2005cv60263
Filed: November 16, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Virginia M Morgan
Presiding Judge: John Corbett OMeara
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER Denying 60 Petition for Evidentiary Hearing filed by Eric Macon, and Denying 58 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Eric Macon. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
January 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 54 OPINION AND ORDER Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eric Macon; and Denying a Certificate of Appealability and Leave to Proceed on Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
December 22, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER denying 50 Motion to Authorize Procedures. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
January 11, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting motion to reinstate habeas petition, amending the caption, and order that the petition be served upon the respondent and the Michigan Attorney General, and order directing respondent to file an answer and the rule 5 materials in this case. Signed by Honorable John Corbett O'Meara. (DHame, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Macon v. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?