Picken v. Louisville Ladder, Incorporated et al
Robert Picken |
Louisville Ladder, Incorporated and Cuprum S.A. de C.V. |
5:2011cv13044 |
July 14, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Ann Arbor Office |
Genesee |
Michael J. Hluchaniuk |
John Corbett O'Meara |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 113 OPINION AND ORDER denying 109 Motion for New Trial. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar) |
Filing 101 ORDER denying without prejudice 64 Motion in Limine; granting 65 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 66 Motion in Limine; denying as moot 67 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 68 Motion in Limine; denying wi thout prejudice 69 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 70 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 71 Motion in Limine; denying as moot 72 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 73 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 74 Motion in Limine; granting 78 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 79 Motion in Limine. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar) |
Filing 60 ORDER denying 57 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar) |
Filing 53 OPINION AND ORDER denying in part 49 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.