Lloyd Design Corporation v. Ford Motor Company
| Lloyd Design Corporation Doing business as Lloyd Mats |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 5:2015cv13075 |
| August 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Michael J Hluchaniuk |
| Judith E Levy |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
STIPULATED ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice - Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (FMos)
|
|
Filing 9
STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint - Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (FMos)
|
|
Filing 8
STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time for Defendant to Respond to #1 Complaint - ( Response due by 12/14/2015) - Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (FMos)
|
|
Filing 7
STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint - Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (FMos)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint,, For Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Ford Motor Company (Phillips, Gregory) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint,, For Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Ford Motor Company (Phillips, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory D. Phillips on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Phillips, Gregory) |
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER Granting #5 Stipulation to File Response to #1 Complaint - ( Response due by 10/29/2015) - Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (FMos)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Ford Motor Company* (DAll) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll) |
| Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Lloyd Design Corporation (Sharkey, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Lloyd Design Corporation against Ford Motor Company with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-5314541 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Trademark Licensing Agreement) (Sharkey, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lloyd Design Corporation v. Ford Motor Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lloyd Design Corporation Doing business as Lloyd Mats | |
| Represented By: | Daniel N. Sharkey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
| Represented By: | Gregory D. Phillips |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
