Haynes v. Gidley
Petitioner: Timothy Haynes
Respondent: Lori Gidley
Case Number: 5:2017cv11442
Filed: May 4, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Ann Arbor Office
County: Gratiot
Presiding Judge: Judith E. Levy
Presiding Judge: Anthony P. Patti
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 OPINION and ORDER (1) Granting Respondent's 7 MOTION for Summary Judgment, (2) Denying Petitioner's 9 MOTION for Equitable Tolling, (3) Denying Certificate of Appealability, (4) and Denying Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SBur)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haynes v. Gidley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Timothy Haynes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lori Gidley
Represented By: John S. Pallas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?