Thelen v. Terris
| Patrick G. Thelen |
| James Billingsley and J.A. Terris |
| 5:2018cv13719 |
| November 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Judith E Levy |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 COPY of #5 Notice mailed to Patrick G. Thelen and returned as undeliverable (DPer) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to dismiss case by Patrick G. Thelen. (DPer) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Patrick G. Thelen. (SSch) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Patrick G. Thelen re #4 Order Requiring Responsive Pleading (NAhm) |
| Filing 5 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
Filing 4
ORDER Requiring Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Response due by 2/7/2019 Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (LGra)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Amending Case Caption. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (LGra)
|
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #4 Order Requiring Responsive Pleading on J.A. Terris (LGra) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Emergency Injunctive Relief by Patrick G. Thelen. (LGra) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Patrick G. Thelen against James Billingsley, Receipt No: 118542 - Fee: $ 5.(LGra) Modified on 12/11/2018 (LGra). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
