Damron v. Terris
Robert Kyle Damron |
James Billingsly and J.A. Terris |
5:2018cv13853 |
December 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
Judith E Levy |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION to appoint counsel by Robert Kyle Damron. (DPer) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by J.A. Terris. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1: Public Information Inmate Data, #3 Exhibit 2: Declaration of Joseph McGuire) (Gaedeke, Patricia) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Patricia G. Gaedeke on behalf of J.A. Terris. (Gaedeke, Patricia) |
Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
Filing 3 ORDER Requiring Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Response due by 3/8/2019 Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (NAhm) |
Filing 2 Order Amending Case Caption. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (NAhm) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 Order Requiring Responsive Pleading on J.A. Terris and U.S. Attorney General. (NAhm) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Robert Kyle Damron against James Billingsly, Receipt No: DET40047 - Fee: $ 5. (DAll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.