Nanografix Corporation v. Pollard Banknote Limited
| Nanografix Corporation |
| Pollard Banknote Limited |
| 5:2019cv10624 |
| March 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Judith E Levy |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's #11 Motion to Bifurcate Trial and Stay Damages. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SBur)
|
|
Filing 22
SCHEDULING ORDER. (Informal Technology Tutorial Conference set for 12/19/2019 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Judith E. Levy and Claim Construction Hearing set for 3/16/2020 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Judith E. Levy) (Refer to image for additional dates) Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SBur)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Judith E. Levy: Scheduling Conference held on 4/22/2019. (SBur) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Judith E. Levy: Motion Hearing held on 4/22/2019 re #11 MOTION to Bifurcate Damages. Disposition: Motion Granted in Part and Denied in Part. (Court Reporter: Jeseca Eddington) (SBur) |
|
Filing 21
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SBur)
|
| Filing 20 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Stipulated Protective Order), #2 Exhibit B (Nanografix's Proposal), #3 Exhibit C (Pollard's Proposal)) (Baltzer, Kourtney) |
| Filing 19 REPLY to Response re #11 MOTION to Bifurcate and Stay Damages filed by Pollard Banknote Limited. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4) (Kornfield, Susan) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER of Attorney Withdrawal with stipulation. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SSch)
|
| Filing 17 RESPONSE to #11 MOTION to Bifurcate and Stay Damages filed by Nanografix Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 7) (Kennedy, Linda) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin Paul Bagdady on behalf of Pollard Banknote Limited. (Bagdady, Justin) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Bill C. Panagos on behalf of Nanografix Corporation. (Panagos, Bill) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Linda Kennedy on behalf of Nanografix Corporation. (Kennedy, Linda) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF HEARING on #11 MOTION to Bifurcate. Motion Hearing set for 4/22/2019 at 10:30 AM before District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SBur) |
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: ***TIME CHANGE ONLY*** Scheduling Conference set for 4/22/2019 at 10:30 AM before District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SBur) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Determination of Motion Without Oral Argument re #11 MOTION to Bifurcate and Stay Damages. (SBur) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Bifurcate and Stay Damages by Pollard Banknote Limited. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6) (Kornfield, Susan) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J. Serra on behalf of Pollard Banknote Limited. (Serra, Michael) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Susan M. Kornfield on behalf of Pollard Banknote Limited. (Kornfield, Susan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Kourtney N. Baltzer on behalf of Pollard Banknote Limited. (Baltzer, Kourtney) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Russell E. Levine on behalf of Pollard Banknote Limited. (Levine, Russell) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Scheduling Conference set for 4/22/2019 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SBur) |
| Filing 5 Docket Sheet from California Central; Case Number 2:18-cv-06735. Modified on 3/4/2019 (VLun). |
| Filing 4 MINUTES OF Defendant Pollard Banknote Limited's Motion to Transfer to the Eastern District of Michigan Pursuant to 28 USC section 1404(a) 26 before Judge George H. Wu: Court hears further argument. The Tentative circulated and attached hereto, is adopted as the Court's Final Ruling. The Court would GRANT the Motion and transfer the matter to the Eastern District of Michigan. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Katie E Thibodeaux. Case transferred electronically. (jp)[Transferred from cacd on 3/4/2019.] |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND, Defenses and, COUNTERCLAIM against Nanografix Corporation filed by Defendant Pollard Banknote Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17)(Schweitzer, Lauren) [Transferred from cacd on 3/4/2019.] |
| Filing 2 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Nanografix Corporation. (Meyer, Derek) [Transferred from cacd on 3/4/2019.] |
| Filing 1 TRANSFERREDCOMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22206368 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Nanografix Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D) (Attorney Derek J Meyer added to party Nanografix Corporation(pty:pla))(Meyer, Derek) [Transferred from California Central; Case Number 2:18-cv-06735] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
