Prela v. Schindler Elevator Corporation et al
| Katrine Prela |
| Macy's Inc. and Schindler Elevator Corporation |
| 5:2019cv12469 |
| August 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Judith E Levy |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
WITNESS LIST by Schindler Elevator Corporation (Rosenau, Courtney)
|
|
Filing 16
WITNESS LIST by Macy's Inc. (Cooney, Henry)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE TO APPEAR: Settlement Conference set for 5/6/2020 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge David R. Grand (EBut)
|
|
Filing 14
STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time to Provide Answers to Discovery, Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER REFERRING OTHER MATTERS to Magistrate Judge Grand : Settlement Conference in Early May 2020. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar)
|
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Fact Discovery due by 4/30/2020 Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 10/23/2020 Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/8/2021 10:00 AM before District Judge Judith E. Levy Jury Trial set for 3/22/2021 08:30 AM before District Judge Judith E. Levy Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (Refer to image for additional dates) (WBar)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Dedvukaj on behalf of Katrine Prela. (Dedvukaj, Joseph)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Judith E. Levy: Scheduling Conference held on 11/7/2019 (Court Reporter: None Present, Not on the Record) (WBar)
|
|
Filing 10
DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Dedvukaj, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 9
EXHIBIT C - Defendant Schindler's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Notice of Removal, by Schindler Elevator Corporation (Agosta, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE TO APPEAR: Scheduling Conference set for 11/7/2019 at 11:30 AM before District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SBur)
|
|
Filing 7
ANSWER to Crossclaim with Affirmative Defenses and Reliance on Jury Demand by Schindler Elevator Corporation. (Rosenau, Courtney)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Dedvukaj on behalf of Katrine Prela. (Dedvukaj, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 5
CROSSCLAIM filed by Macy's Inc. against Schindler Elevator Corporation (Cooney, Henry)
|
|
Filing 4
ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Macy's Inc.. (Cooney, Henry)
|
|
Filing 3
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Schindler Elevator Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Schindler Enterprises, Inc. for Schindler Elevator Corporation. (Agosta, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Courtney L. Rosenau on behalf of Schindler Elevator Corporation. (Rosenau, Courtney)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Schindler Elevator Corporation from Oakland County Circuit Court, case number 2019-175364-NO. Receipt No: 0645-7374447 - Fee: $ 400 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal) (Agosta, Anthony)
|
|
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (AFla)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
