Ashh, Inc. v. Nashwan Corporation
Ashh, Inc. |
Nashwan Corporation |
2:2019cv13229 |
November 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Nancy G Edmunds |
Judith E Levy |
Anthony P Patti |
Elizabeth A Stafford |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 STIPULATED ORDER DISMISSING CASE - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Ashh, Inc. (Pauwels, Andrew) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION AND ORDER re #1 Complaint (Responsive Pleading due by 12/16/2019) - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar) |
Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Judith E. Levy and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford in Ann Arbor to District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds and Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti in Detroit. (NAhm) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Nashwan Corporation served on 11/4/2019, answer due 11/25/2019. (Pauwels, Andrew) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ka'Nea Kenyetta Brooks on behalf of Ashh, Inc.. (Brooks, Ka'Nea) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew M. Pauwels on behalf of Ashh, Inc.. (Pauwels, Andrew) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Nashwan Corporation* (DPer) |
Filing 3 Trademark Report Sent To Washington (Swedlow, Deborah) |
Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Ashh, Inc. (Swedlow, Deborah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ashh, Inc. against Nashwan Corporation with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7470959 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Macomb. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan, 19-cv-13223; 19-cv-13228, Judge Nancy G. Edmunds; Linda V. Parker] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A. Ooze Trademarks, #3 Exhibit B. Receipt for Counterfeit Goods, #4 Exhibit C. September 5, 2019 Letter, #5 Exhibit D. September 26, 2019 Letter, #6 Exhibit E. October 2, 2019 Letter) (Swedlow, Deborah) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ashh, Inc. v. Nashwan Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nashwan Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ashh, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Ka'Nea Kenyetta Brooks |
Represented By: | Andrew M. Pauwels |
Represented By: | Deborah J. Swedlow |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.