Rahaman v. American Connect Family Prop and Cas Ins.
| 5:2020cv11628 |
| September 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Ann Arbor Office |
| P.I.: Other |
| No cause code entered |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
OPINION AND ORDER denying 57 Motion for relief from judgment. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar)
|
|
Filing
55
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 36 , GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 22 , DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS MOOT [40, 41], DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR RECUSAL 42 , DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 45 , AND DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AS MOOT 49 Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (KGri)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Adopting 32 Report and Recommendation; Granting 21 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 16 Motion for Reconsideration AND STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S DUPLACATIVE 18 Motion for Reconsideration - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rahaman v. American Connect Family Prop and Cas Ins. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
