Select Distributors, LLC et al v. Breeze Smoke, LLC et al
Select Distributors, LLC, Noor Kestou and SD Import, LLC |
John Mayou, John Meyou, Rafi Kashat, Kream Sisters Event Planning, Inc., Mark Faraj, Breeze Smoke, LLC, Wassan Putrus and Sara Mayou |
5:2020cv12944 |
November 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Judith E Levy |
Elizabeth A Stafford |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1125 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER Granting IN PART #29 MOTION for Extension of time to respond to #22 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction; Response due by 1/8/2021, Reply due by 1/15/2021, Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar) |
Filing 32 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Pauwels, Andrew) |
Filing 31 REPLY to Response re #29 MOTION Extension of time to Respond to Counter-Plaintiff's Motion re #22 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by All Plaintiffs. (Weintraub, Arnold) |
Filing 30 RESPONSE to #29 MOTION Extension of time to Respond to Counter-Plaintiff's Motion re #22 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Breeze Smoke, LLC. (Hyde, Mary) |
Filing 29 MOTION Extension of time to Respond to Counter-Plaintiff's Motion re #22 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A) (Weintraub, Arnold) |
Filing 28 NOTICE OF HEARING BY VIDEO CONFERENCE on #22 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction . Response due by 1/4/2021 Reply due by 1/14/2021 Motion Hearing set for 1/21/2021 02:00 PM before District Judge Judith E. Levy |Zoom Webinar Information: https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1618911891?pwd=QVYzSnJiMkEzMTlOaUNwckc1eFFYZz09 Passcode: 598966 Or iPhone one-tap : US: +16692545252,,1618911891# or +16468287666,,1618911891#| (WBar) |
Filing 27 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY VIDEO CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 1/6/2021 10:30 AM before District Judge Judith E. Levy***Counsel shall review Fed. R. Civ. Proc. Rule 26(f) and file with the Court a joint discovery plan no later than 3 business days before the conference*** (WBar) |
Filing 26 DECLARATION by Mary A. Hyde re #23 Supplemental Brief in Support of Defendant/Counter-Defendant Breeze Smoke LLC's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Breeze Smoke, LLC (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C) (Hyde, Mary) |
Filing 25 DECLARATION by Mohamad Sareb re #23 Supplemental Brief in Support of Defendant/Counter-Defendant Breeze Smoke LLC's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Breeze Smoke, LLC (Hyde, Mary) |
Filing 24 DECLARATION by Steven Haddad re #23 Supplemental Brief in Support of Defendant/Counter-Defendant Breeze Smoke LLC's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Breeze Smoke, LLC (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J) (Hyde, Mary) |
Filing 23 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re #22 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Breeze Smoke, LLC, Mark Faraj. (Hyde, Mary) |
Filing 22 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Breeze Smoke, LLC, Mark Faraj. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Order) (Hyde, Mary) |
Filing 21 ANSWER to #7 Answer to Complaint,,,, Counterclaim,,, by All Plaintiffs. (Weintraub, Arnold) |
Filing 20 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by John Mayou, Sara Mayou. (King, Stephen) |
Filing 19 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Kream Sisters Event Planning, Inc. (King, Stephen) |
Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Kream Sisters Event Planning, Inc.. (King, Stephen) |
Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Rafi Kashat. (King, Stephen) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew M. Pauwels on behalf of Breeze Smoke, LLC, Mark Faraj. (Pauwels, Andrew) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Alexander Hyde on behalf of Breeze Smoke, LLC, Mark Faraj. (Hyde, Mary) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. All Plaintiffs. (Weintraub, Arnold) |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. All Plaintiffs. (Weintraub, Arnold) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. All Plaintiffs. (Weintraub, Arnold) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. All Plaintiffs. (Weintraub, Arnold) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. All Plaintiffs. (Weintraub, Arnold) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. All Plaintiffs. (Weintraub, Arnold) |
Filing 8 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Breeze Smoke, LLC, Mark Faraj (Lamb, Jeffrey) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand Defendant Breeze Smoke LLC's and Defendant Mark Faraj's Answer to Verified Complaint, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims, COUNTERCLAIM filed by Mark Faraj, Breeze Smoke, LLC against All Plaintiffs by Mark Faraj, Breeze Smoke, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - TESS Page for U.S. Trademark Application No. 90/012,117 for BREEZE SMOKE, #3 Exhibit B - TESS Page for U.S. Trademark Application No. 90/246,820 for BREEZE PLUS, #4 Exhibit C - TESS Page for U.S. Trademark Application No. 90/148,875 for SEA BREEZE PLUS, #5 Exhibit D - October 5, 2020 Cease and Desist Letter from Breeze Smoke to Counter-Defendants, #6 Exhibit E - October 19, 2020 Response to Cease and Desist Letter from Counter-Defendants to Breeze Smoke, #7 Exhibit F - Examples of Counter-Defendants Infringing Uses of the BREEZE Marks and BREEZE Trade Dress) (Lamb, Jeffrey) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued for *John Mayou* (NAhm) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued for *Sara Mayou* (NAhm) |
Filing 4 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Select Distributors, LLC (Weintraub, Arnold) |
Filing 3 Trademark Report Sent To Washington (Weintraub, Arnold) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Breeze Smoke, LLC, Mark Faraj, Rafi Kashat, Kream Sisters Event Planning, Inc., Wassan Putrus* (NAhm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8142117 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C) (Weintraub, Arnold) |
NOTICE of Error directed to: Arnold S. Weintraub re #1 Complaint,,. Parties listed on the initiating document were omitted and John Mayou is misspelled. The filing attorney must use the docket event Addition of Parties to correct the error. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (NAhm) |
Addition of Parties to CM/ECF: Defendant Sara Mayou. Reason: The party was not added to CM/ECF when e-filing #1 Complaint,, #2 Summons Issued Plaintiff requests summons issued. (Weintraub, Arnold) |
Addition of Parties to CM/ECF: Defendant John Mayou. Reason: Party name Misspelled on previous filing. Plaintiff requests summons issued. (Weintraub, Arnold) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.