Castro v. Hinkley et al
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, SECRETARY Chad Wolf, FIELD OFFICE DIRECTO REBECCA J. ADDUCCI, US Dept of Justice, SHERIFF Steven Hinkley and DIRECTOR Tony H Pham |
Guo Yan Lin Castro |
Commissioner Mark M. Morgan |
5:2020cv13384 |
December 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Terrence G Berg |
Judith E Levy |
Anthony P Patti |
R Steven Whalen |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer L. Newby on behalf of REBECCA J. ADDUCCI, Tony H Pham, US Dept of Justice, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Chad Wolf, Mark M. Morgan. (Newby, Jennifer) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Guo Yan Lin Castro Petitioner (DE Graaf, Kai) |
Filing 2 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Terrence G. Berg and Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen in Detroit to District Judge Judith E. Levy and Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti in Ann Arbor. (NAhm) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Guo Yan Lin Castro against REBECCA J. ADDUCCI, Steven Hinkley, Tony H Pham, US Dept of Justice, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Chad Wolf, Receipt No: AMIEDC-8238343 - Fee: $ 5. [Possible companion case: US DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT MICHIGAN, 20-CV-10829, Judge JUDITH E LEVY] (DE Graaf, Kai) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.