Hayward Property, L.L.C. v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
| Hayward Property, L.L.C. |
| Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company |
| 5:2020mc50286 |
| February 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Judith E Levy |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REPLY to Response re #1 INITIATING MOTION Require Hayward Property to Produce all Documents Requested in Commonwealth Land Title's Subpoenas and Further Deposition Testimony by Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company. Receipt No: 0645-7609872 - Fee: 47 doll filed by Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company. (Carroll, Michael) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to #1 INITIATING MOTION Require Hayward Property to Produce all Documents Requested in Commonwealth Land Title's Subpoenas and Further Deposition Testimony by Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company. Receipt No: 0645-7609872 - Fee: 47 doll filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10) (Eyre, Douglas) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Determination of Motion Without Oral Argument re #1 INITIATING MOTION to Require Hayward Property to Produce all Documents Requested in Commonwealth Land Title's Subpoenas and Further Deposition Testimony; Response due by 3/16/2020 Reply due by 3/30/2020 (WBar) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Mark L. McAlpine appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs Hayward Property, L.L.C. (McAlpine, Mark) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Douglas W. Eyre appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs Hayward Property, L.L.C. (Eyre, Douglas) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #1 INITIATING MOTION Require Hayward Property to Produce all Documents Requested in Commonwealth Land Title's Subpoenas and Further Deposition Testimony by Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company. Receipt No: 0645-7609872 - Fee: 47 doll by Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company (Powell, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 INITIATING MOTION Require Hayward Property to Produce all Documents Requested in Commonwealth Land Title's Subpoenas and Further Deposition Testimony by Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company. Receipt No: 0645-7609872 - Fee: 47 dollars (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Statement of Disputed Documents Requests, #3 Exhibit B - Order Denying Motion to Dismiss, #4 Exhibit C - Deposition of Matthew Moroun, #5 Exhibit D - A.L.T.A. Survey, #6 Exhibit E - Site Map, #7 Exhibit F - April 14, 2003 Alameda County, California Assessor Letter, #8 Exhibit G - Deposition of Gregory Burcz, #9 Exhibit H - September 11, 2003 Letter, #10 Exhibit I - Hayward Property, LLC's Answers and Objections to Commonwealth Interrogatories, #11 Exhibit J - Deposition of George Preston Graham, #12 Exhibit K - Richard Sundquist Subpoena, #13 Exhibit L - Deposition of Richard Sundquist, #14 Exhibit M - Declaration of Robert B. Hunter, #15 Exhibit N - Deposition of Mark Shapiro, #16 Exhibit O - Non-Party Richard Sundquist's Objections to Subpoena) (Powell, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
