EAGAN v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
MARGARET EAGAN |
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC and JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
5:2021cv10839 |
April 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
Judith E Levy |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (EBut) |
Filing 12 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand: #10 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by PennyMac Loan Services, LLC. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar) |
Filing 11 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by PennyMac Loan Services, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Private National Mortgage Acceptance Company LLC for PennyMac Loan Services, LLC. (Groendyk, Randall) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by PennyMac Loan Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Mortgage, #3 Exhibit B - Assignment of Mortgage, #4 Exhibit C - Assignment of Mortgage, #5 Exhibit D - Assignment of Mortgage, #6 Exhibit E - Assignment of Mortgage, #7 Exhibit F - Assignment of Mortgage, #8 Exhibit G - Rescission of Assignment of Mortgage) (Groendyk, Randall) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Randall J. Groendyk on behalf of PennyMac Loan Services, LLC. (Groendyk, Randall) |
Filing 8 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by JPMorgan Chase & Co. identifying Corporate Parent JPMorgan Chase & Co. for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. (Chang, Jong-Ju) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by JPMorgan Chase & Co.. (Chang, Jong-Ju) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: David M. Dell appearing on behalf of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (Dell, David) |
Filing 5 STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time for Defendant PennyMac to Answer Complaint; Responsive Pleading due by 5/24/2021, Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to answer the complaint; Responsive Pleading due by 5/17/2021, Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Joinder/Concurrence in #1 Notice of Removal, filed by JPMorgan Chase & Co. by PennyMac Loan Services, LLC (Gottlieb, Amy) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Amy Sabbota Gottlieb appearing on behalf of PennyMac Loan Services, LLC (Gottlieb, Amy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. from Oakland County Circuit Court, case number 2021-186633-CK. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8427529 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Summons & Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - OCCC Documents, #4 Exhibit C - Mortgage, #5 Exhibit D - Property Tax Info) (Chang, Jong-Ju) |
NOTICE of Error directed to: Jong-Ju Chang re #1 Notice of Removal,. Parties [JPMorgan Chase & Co.] listed on the initiating document were omitted. The filing attorney must use the docket event Addition of Parties to correct the error. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (NAhm) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.