Interface Security Systems, LLC v. Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Plaintiff: Interface Security Systems, LLC
Defendant: Hawk Technology Systems, LLC and Hawk Technology Systems LLC
Case Number: 2:2021cv12523
Filed: October 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Kimberly G Altman
Referring Judge: Terrence G Berg
2 Judge: Stephanie Dawkins Davis
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER of RECUSAL and REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds to District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (SSch)
June 16, 2022 Text-Only Order of reassignment from District Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis in Flint to District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds in Detroit pursuant to Administrative Order 22-AO-036. (SSch)
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Fact Discovery due by 12/31/2023, Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 4/29/2024. Signed by District Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis. (Refer to image for additional dates) (RLou)
May 11, 2022 TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: Telephonic Scheduling Conference on 5/13/2022 is Cancelled. A Case Management and Scheduling Order will be issued. (RLou)
May 7, 2022 Filing 15 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Winterle, Bret)
April 12, 2022 Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Shulman, Marc)
April 12, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Scheduling Conference set for 5/13/2022 at 11:00 AM before District Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis (RLou)
April 12, 2022 Filing 12 ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by All Defendants. (Shulman, Marc)
April 12, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Marc Shulman on behalf of All Defendants. (Shulman, Marc)
February 25, 2022 Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Hawk Technology Systems, LLC waiver sent on 2/2/2022, answer due 4/4/2022. (Winterle, Bret)
February 25, 2022 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Hawk Technology Systems LLC waiver sent on 2/2/2022, answer due 4/4/2022. (Winterle, Bret)
January 28, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued for *Hawk Technology Systems, LLC* (SKra)
January 28, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued for *Hawk Technology Systems LLC* (SKra)
January 27, 2022 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Interface Security Systems, LLC against Hawk Technology Systems, LLC, Hawk Technology Systems LLC. NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F) (Winterle, Bret)
January 27, 2022 REQUEST for SUMMONS for Hawk Technology Systems LLC, Hawk Technology Systems, LLC. (Winterle, Bret)
November 12, 2021 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Hawk Technology Systems, LLC served on 10/29/2021, answer due 11/19/2021. (Davis, Ahmed)
October 27, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Hawk Technology Systems, LLC* (KBro)
October 27, 2021 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (KBro)
October 26, 2021 Filing 3 Patent Report Sent To Washington (Davis, Ahmed)
October 26, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE by Interface Security Systems, LLC DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS AND FINANCIAL INTEREST (Davis, Ahmed)
October 26, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Interface Security Systems, LLC against Hawk Technology Systems, LLC with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8668439 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: St. Louis County, MO - County Where Action Arose: Out of State - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland County, MI. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - 2021-06-24- Hawk Technology Systems LLC Patent License No.10.499.091 (002), #2 Exhibit Ex B - US10499091, #3 Exhibit Ex C - US10945004) (Davis, Ahmed)
October 26, 2021 REQUEST for SUMMONS for Hawk Technology Systems, LLC. (Davis, Ahmed)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Interface Security Systems, LLC v. Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Interface Security Systems, LLC
Represented By: Ahmed J. Davis
Represented By: Bret T. Winterle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Represented By: Marc Shulman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hawk Technology Systems LLC
Represented By: Marc Shulman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?