Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Progressive Marathon Insurance Company
| Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company |
| Progressive Marathon Insurance Company |
| 5:2021cv12731 |
| November 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Judith E Levy |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses , COUNTERCLAIM filed by Progressive Marathon Insurance Company against Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company by Progressive Marathon Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B) (Meyer, Brian) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason W. Baas on behalf of Progressive Marathon Insurance Company. (Baas, Jason) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian R. Meyer on behalf of Progressive Marathon Insurance Company. (Meyer, Brian) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Progressive Marathon Insurance Company* (SKra) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Other Relief filed by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company against Progressive Marathon Insurance Company. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8699776 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Oakland County - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits to Complaint, #2 Exhibit Progressive Policy Declarations and Form, #3 Exhibit McNeeley-OakMed LLC Home Health Aide Contract, #4 Exhibit Select Luca-OakMed LLC Employment Documents, #5 Exhibit McNeeley-Hendrix Complaint in Oakland County Circuit Court, #6 Exhibit McNeeley-Hendrix First Amended Complaint in Oakland County Circuit Court, #7 Exhibit November 20, 2018 Tender of Defense of OakMed, LLC, #8 Exhibit November 21, 2021 Progressive Denial of Tender of Defense) (Kelley, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Progressive Marathon Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Stephen M. Kelley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Progressive Marathon Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Brian R. Meyer |
| Represented By: | Jason W. Baas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
