Perry v. Warden/RRM Detroit et al
| Sean Austin Perry |
| Warden/RRM Detroit and United States of America |
| 5:2022cv11717 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| Judith E Levy |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
LETTER from Shaninique Baker (DPer)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #2 Order Requiring Responsive Pleading, on Sean Austin Perry, No. 10200-088 at 39835 Rockcrest Circle, Northville, MI 48168. (WBar)
|
|
Filing 4
COPY of #2 Order mailed to Sean Austin Perry and returned as undeliverable (DPer)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER Requiring Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Attached Petition has been electronically served on the Office of the United States Attorney. Response due by 9/30/2022 Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (Attachments: #1 Habeas Petition) (TTho)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Sean Austin Perry against United States of America, Warden/RRM Detroit. [TITLED AS A MOTION] (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Filing Fee Paid) (TTho) Modified on 7/26/2022 (TTho).
|
|
FILING FEE Received in the amount of 5.00 by Sean Austin Perry - Receipt No. 150001051 [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (BHan)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
