Tieppo v. Quint et al
Adolph Tieppo |
Alexander Quint and Quint Capital Corporation |
5:2023cv11871 |
August 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Judith E Levy |
Anthony P Patti |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER to Strike 16 . Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar) |
Filing 15 ORDER Regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar) |
Filing 14 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti: #12 MOTION Dismiss filed by Quint Capital Corporation, Alexander Quint. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE to #12 MOTION Dismiss filed by Adolph Tieppo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A) (Torigian, Alec) |
Filing 12 MOTION Dismiss by All Defendants. (Carmichael, Ralph) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER: On August 29, 2023, Defendants Alexander Quint and Quint Capital Corporation filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 11.) The motion was docketed in CM/ECF using the incorrect event, so the docket inaccurately identifies this filing as an answer to the complaint. Because the filing was docketed improperly, Defendants motion (ECF No. 11) is STRICKEN. If Defendants wish to refile their motion, they must do so using the correct event in CM/ECF. (The correct event in CM/ECF is dismiss, located under the motions heading.) Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar) |
Filing 10 ORDER Striking 8 MOTION to Dismiss, and 9 Attorney Appearance. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar) |
Filing 7 [FILING ERROR: INCORRECT DOCUMENTS UPLOADED] ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by All Defendants. (Carmichael, Ralph) Modified on 8/28/2023 (DPer). |
NOTICE of error directed to Ralph William Carmichael re 8 Motion to dismiss. The attorney appearance needs to be filed separately. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (DPer) |
NOTICE of error directed to Ralph William Carmichael re #7 Answer to Complaint. Wrong PDF images were uploaded. Documents were stricken and must be refiled correctly. The attorney appearance and motion to dismiss need to be filed as separate documents. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (DPer) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Alexander Quint served on 8/15/2023, answer due 9/5/2023. (Torigian, Alec) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Quint Capital Corporation served on 8/15/2023, answer due 9/5/2023. (Torigian, Alec) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian M. Akkashian on behalf of Adolph Tieppo. (Akkashian, Brian) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Quint Capital Corporation* (LGra) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Alexander Quint* (LGra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Adolph Tieppo against Alexander Quint, Quint Capital Corporation. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9440149 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: New York. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A) (Torigian, Alec) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.