Bryant v. Braunlich et al
Richard Eugene Bryant |
Mark Braunlich, Mark Grummon and Annamarie Osment |
5:2023cv12405 |
September 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Kimberly G Altman |
Judith E Levy |
P.I.: Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 REPLY to Response re #10 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief in Support and Proof of Service with Proof of Service filed by Mark Braunlich, Mark Grummon, Annamarie Osment. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 6 - Davis v McClain, #2 Exhibit 7 - Mudford v Brown, #3 Exhibit 8 - Mezzano v Seond Jud. Dist. Ct. of the State of Nevada) (Beindit, Thomas) |
Filing 15 EXHIBIT by Richard Eugene Bryant (SSch) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE to #10 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief in Support and Proof of Service filed by Richard Eugene Bryant. (SSch) |
Filing 13 ORDER Requiring Response to #10 Motion to Dismiss - Response due by 11/20/2023 - Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman. (CCie) |
Filing 12 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman: #10 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #12 Order Referring Motion to Magistrate Judge on Richard Eugene Bryant at P.O. Box 1321, Lincoln Park, MI 48146. (WBar) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #13 Order Requiring Responsive Pleading on Richard Eugene Bryant at P.O. BOX 1321, Lincoln Park, MI 48146. (CCie) |
Filing 11 EXHIBIT Index of Unpublished Authority re #10 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief in Support and Proof of Service by Mark Braunlich, Mark Grummon, Annamarie Osment (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Bey v Braunlich, #2 Exhibit 2 - Bowerman v Lyon, #3 Exhibit 3 - King v McCree, #4 Exhibit 4 - Mudford v Brown, #5 Exhibit 5 - Phillips v Randall S. Miller & Assoc, #6 Exhibit 6 - Potter v City of Detroit, #7 Exhibit 7 - Ragland v City of St. Louis, #8 Exhibit 8 - Ready for the World Inc. v Riley, #9 Exhibit 9 - Schultz v City of Wyoming, #10 Exhibit 10 - Zindler v Rogers) (Beindit, Thomas) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief in Support and Proof of Service by Mark Braunlich, Mark Grummon, Annamarie Osment. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit 2 - Transcript, #3 Exhibit 3 - First Complaint, #4 Exhibit 4 - Second Complaint, #5 Exhibit 5 - 10/12/23 Correspondence) (Beindit, Thomas) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew J. Brege on behalf of Mark Braunlich, Mark Grummon, Annamarie Osment. (Brege, Andrew) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas David Beindit on behalf of Mark Braunlich, Mark Grummon, Annamarie Osment. (Beindit, Thomas) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Richard Eugene Bryant [NO GREEN CARD FILED SIGNED BY ANNAMARIE OSMENT] (TTho) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Mark Braunlich served on 9/27/2023, answer due 10/18/2023; Mark Grummon served on 9/27/2023, answer due 10/18/2023. (TTho) |
Filing 5 NOTICE Regarding Resources for Self-Represented Litigants. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #5 Notice on Richard Eugene Bryant at P.O. Box 1321, Lincoln Park, MI 48146. (WBar) |
Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (DJen) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Mark Braunlich, Mark Grummon, Annamarie Osment* (TTho) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Richard Eugene Bryant against All Defendants Receipt No: 150007115 - Fee: $ 402. (TTho) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.