BDD Group, LLC v. Crave Franchising, LLC et al
BDD Group, LLC |
Crave Franchising, LLC, SAMANTHA RINCIONE and SALVATORE RINCIONE |
5:2024cv10035 |
January 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Paul D Borman |
Judith E Levy |
Elizabeth A Stafford |
Contract: Franchise |
15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 RESPONSE to #13 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration filed by BDD Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Franchise Agreement, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Initial Email Inquiry, #3 Exhibit Ex. C- FDD, #4 Exhibit Ex. D - Personalized Estimate, #5 Exhibit Ex. E - Addendem to Franchise Agreement) (Amine, Kassem) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE to #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b)(2) filed by BDD Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Initial Email Inquiry, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Franchise Disclosure Document, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - Pro Forma, #4 Exhibit Ex. D - Personalized Estimate, #5 Exhibit Ex. E - Email Re Provost, #6 Exhibit Ex. F - August Loan Increase, #7 Exhibit Ex. G - November 4, 2021 Loan Increase, #8 Exhibit Ex. H - August 29, 2022 Loan Increase, #9 Exhibit Ex. I - 11.30.24 Notice of Default, #10 Exhibit Ex. J - Demand for Possession, #11 Exhibit Ex. K - Email Regarding Royalty Pause, #12 Exhibit Ex. L - Email Regarding Former) (Amine, Kassem) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF IN PERSON HEARING on #13 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration, #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b)(2). Motion Hearing set for 5/9/2024 10:30 AM before District Judge Judith E. Levy (WBar) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration by Crave Franchising, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Franchise Agreement) (Waslawski, Daniel) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b)(2) by Salvatore Rincione, Samantha Rincione. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Samantha Rincione, #3 Exhibit 1-A Addendum to Franchise Agreement, #4 Exhibit 2 - Affidavit of Salvatore Rincione, #5 Exhibit 2-A - Copy of 09/07/2020 email, #6 Exhibit 2-B - 12/07/2020 email) (Waslawski, Daniel) |
Filing 11 Order Vacating #8 Order to Show Cause. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by BDD Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Crave Franchising, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Rincione Investments) (Amine, Kassem) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by BDD Group, LLC against All Defendants. NO NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Initial Email Inquiry, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Franchise Disclosure Document, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - Personalized Estimate, #4 Exhibit Ex. D - Pro Forma, #5 Exhibit Ex. E - Franchise Agreement, #6 Exhibit Ex. F - August 29, 2021 Loan Increase, #7 Exhibit Ex. G - November 4, 2021 Loan Increase, #8 Exhibit Ex. H - August 29, 2022 Loan Increase, #9 Exhibit Ex. I - 11.30.24 Notice of Default, #10 Exhibit Ex. J - Demand for Possession, #11 Exhibit Ex. K - Email Re Royalty Pause, #12 Exhibit Ex. L - Email Re Former Franchisee, #13 Exhibit Ex. M - 2021 FDD) (Amine, Kassem) |
Filing 8 ORDER for Plaintiff to Show Cause, in writing, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; Show Cause Response due by 1/26/2024, Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Scott D. Stoner appearing on behalf of Crave Franchising, LLC, Salvatore Rincione, Samantha Rincione (Stoner, Scott) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Zeth D. Hearld appearing on behalf of Crave Franchising, LLC, Salvatore Rincione, Samantha Rincione (Hearld, Zeth) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Daniel C. Waslawski appearing on behalf of Crave Franchising, LLC, Salvatore Rincione, Samantha Rincione (Waslawski, Daniel) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (DJen) |
Filing 3 ORDER of RECUSAL and REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Paul D. Borman in Detroit to District Judge Judith E. Levy in Ann Arbor. (SSch) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kassem M. Dakhlallah on behalf of BDD Group, LLC. (Dakhlallah, Kassem) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DJen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by BDD Group, LLC against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9613723 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Genesee - County Where Action Arose: Wayne County - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Initial Email Inquiry, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - 2020 FDD, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - Personalized Investment Estimate, #4 Exhibit Ex. D - Pro Forma, #5 Exhibit Ex. E - Franchise Agreement, #6 Exhibit Ex. F - August 2021 Loan Increase, #7 Exhibit Ex. G - November 2021 Loan Increase, #8 Exhibit Ex. H - August 2022 Loan Increase, #9 Exhibit Ex. I - Notice of Default, #10 Exhibit Ex. J - Demand for Possession, #11 Exhibit Ex. K - Email Re Royalty Pause, #12 Exhibit Ex. L - Email Re Former Franchisee, #13 Exhibit Ex. M - 2021 FDD) (Amine, Kassem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.