FenF, LLC v. Handelnine Glogal LLC
FenF, LLC |
Handelnine Glogal LLC Doing business as Navafresh |
5:2024cv10288 |
February 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
Judith E Levy |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to *Handelnine Glogal LLC* (LGra) |
Filing 7 REQUEST FOR CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Handelnine Glogal LLC by FenF, LLC. (Hoffmann, Richard) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Handelnine Glogal LLC served on 2/5/2024, answer due 2/26/2024. (Hoffmann, Richard) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued for *Handelnine Glogal LLC* (DAll) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll) |
Filing 4 Copyright Report Sent To Washington (Hoffmann, Richard) |
Filing 3 Trademark Report Sent To Washington (Hoffmann, Richard) |
Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by FenF, LLC (Hoffmann, Richard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by FenF, LLC against FenF, LLC with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9648710 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Washtenaw - County Where Action Arose: Washtenaw - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,253,636, #3 Exhibit B Defendants Royalkart Ad p1, #4 Exhibit C - U.S. Trademark Registration No. 5,098,981, #5 Exhibit D Defendants Gemstone Ad 1, #6 Exhibit E Defendants Gemstone Ad 2, #7 Exhibit F Defendants Gemstone Ad 3, #8 Exhibit G - U.S. Trademark Registration No. 5,099,070, #9 Exhibit H Defendants Color Blue Ad 1, #10 Exhibit I - Defendants Color Blue Ad 2, #11 Exhibit J Defendants Color Blue Ad 3, #12 Exhibit K Defendants Color Blue Ad 4, #13 Exhibit L Defendants Color Blue Ad 5, #14 Exhibit M U.S. Copyright Registration No. VA 1-943-431, #15 Exhibit N U.S. Copyright Registration No. VA 2-100-631, #16 Exhibit O U.S. Copyright Registration Nos. VA 2-120-655 and VA 2-231-415, #17 Exhibit P - U.S. Copyright Registration No. VA 2-010-631, #18 Exhibit Q - U.S. Copyright Registration No. VA 2-119-794, #19 Exhibit R - Defendants Royalkart Ad p2) (Hoffmann, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: FenF, LLC v. Handelnine Glogal LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: FenF, LLC | |
Represented By: | Richard W. Hoffmann |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Handelnine Glogal LLC Doing business as Navafresh | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.