Gemtron Corporation v. Saint-Gobain Corporation
| Gemtron Corporation |
| Saint-Gobain Corporation |
| Facilitative Mediator |
| 1:2004cv00387 |
| February 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| EDMI Senior Judge Avern C. Cohn |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
890
Supplement to 829 Final JUDGMENT ; signed by EDMI Judge Avern Cohn (EDMI Judge Avern Cohn, jao)
|
|
Filing
876
ORDER Dissolving Stay and Restoring Case to an Open Status ; signed by EDMI Judge Avern Cohn (EDMI Judge Avern Cohn, jao)
|
|
Filing
870
MEMORANDUM and ORDER denying motion for contempt 860 ; signed by EDMI Judge Avern C. Cohn (EDMI Judge Avern C. Cohn, jao)
|
|
Filing
858
ORDER granting 851 Motion to Lift Stay of Permanent Injunction ; signed by EDMI Judge Avern C. Cohn (EDMI Judge Avern C. Cohn, jao)
|
|
Filing
849
ORDER Denying Costs ; signed by EDMI Judge Avern C. Cohn (EDMI Judge Avern C. Cohn, jao)
|
|
Filing
829
FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff against Defendant ; signed by EDMI Judge Avern C. Cohn (EDMI Judge Avern C. Cohn, jao)
|
|
Filing
650
ORDER denying 643 motion to seal ; signed by EDMI Judge Avern C. Cohn (EDMI Judge Avern C. Cohn, jao)
|
|
Filing
641
AMENDED PARTIAL JUDGMENT ; signed by EDMI Judge Avern C. Cohn (EDMI Judge Avern C. Cohn, jao) Modified text on 2/5/2008 (jlg).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
