Cox #465798 v. Curtin
| 1:2006cv00405 |
| June 12, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| O Office |
| Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman |
| Judge Gordon J. Quist |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| O |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 58 ; Mr. Cox's motion to amend 51 is DENIED. Mr. Cox's motion for habeas corpus under section 2254 is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED. If a new trial is not scheduled within ninety days of this Order, Mr. Cox shall be unconditionally released from custody and the charges against him shall be dismissed; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
|
|
Filing
58
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 51 , 12 ; objections to R&R due within 14 days; signed by Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, Jr (Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, Jr., fhw)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 motion to produce documents; signed by Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, Jr (Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, Jr., fhw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cox #465798 v. Curtin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
