Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. v. USA Truck, Inc.
Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. |
USA Truck, Inc. |
1:2007cv00437 |
May 1, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Southern Division (1) Office |
Ingham |
Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER denying 31 plaintiff's motion for reconsideration; signed by Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen (Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen, blb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. v. USA Truck, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. | |
Represented By: | Timothy Michael Lessing |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA Truck, Inc. | |
Represented By: | John W. Bryant |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.