Floyd #286445 v. Ferguson et al
| Adron Littlmane Floyd #286445 |
| B. Wolever, J. Ferguson, Unknown Greenfield, K. Wood, Daniel Stine, Brian Chaffee, Unknown Sanchez, Anne Maroulis and D. Watkins |
| 1:2007cv00478 |
| May 17, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| O Office |
| Ionia |
| Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley |
| Janet T. Neff |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| O |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 72 , Defendants' second motion for summary judgment 54 is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED in its entirety; Judgment to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
|
Filing
72
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants' second motion for summary judgment 54 be granted and this case be dismissed in its entirety; objections to R&R due within 14 days; signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley (Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley, cpl)
|
|
Filing
44
OPINION; ORDER in accordance with Opinion ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 41 ; the motion for summary judgment 22 is granted only as to defendant Kemp, the Magistrate Judge shall reconsider the motion for summary judgment 22 as to the remaining movants; plaintiff's motion for order to have court papers notarized 28 is granted; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
