Bell-Coker v. Lansing, City of et al
| Terrilyn Bell-Coker |
| Lansing, City of, Aaron Terrill, Jason Pung, Lorien Williams, Dennis Bunch, Del Kostanko, Kevin Schlagel, Beth Larabee, Cedric Ford and Mandi Brunner |
| 1:2007cv00812 |
| August 20, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Ingham |
| Judge Paul L. Maloney |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 65 motion to disallow some or all of Defendants' claim costs; approving the Defendants' proposed bill of costs; directing the Plaintiff to pay said costs to defense counsel ; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb)
|
|
Filing
62
OPINION AND ORDER granting 40 Defendants' motion for summary judgment on the Federal claim; declining supplemental jurisdiction over the State-Law claims; denying 58 without prejudice as moot defendants' motion in limine; terminating and closing the case; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb)
|
|
Filing
55
OPINION AND ORDER conditionally granting Plaintiff's request to dismiss without prejudice Counts 2, 3, and 8; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
