Kwik.Sew Pattern Co., Inc. v. Gendron et al
| Kwik.Sew Pattern Co., Inc. |
| Derek Gendron, Lynn Gendron, DeGe Network LLC and Progressive Data Tech LLC |
| 1:2008cv00309 |
| April 2, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Trademark Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Judge Gordon J. Quist |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1338 Trademark Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting Plaintiff's Motion 119 To Strike; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
|
|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 97 motion for reconsideration; denying motion to clarify 99 ; denying 102 , 104 motions for recusal; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER granting 75 motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis; signed by Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, Jr (Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, Jr., fhw)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER denying 80 motion for order to allow electronic filing; denying 84 motion for order to allow electronic filing; signed by Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, Jr (Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, Jr., fhw)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER Plaintiff to submit unredacted records within ten (10) days for in camera review; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, pgh) Modified on 9/26/2008 to edit text (elc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
