Hardy #252393 v. Smith
Defendant: Willie O. Smith
Petitioner: Gregory Hardy #252393
Case Number: 1:2008cv00321
Filed: April 4, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Ionia
Presiding Judge: Judge Janet T. Neff
Presiding Judge: Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 15 FINAL ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 7 ; Request for Court Records 13 , Motion to Amend 11 , Motion to Sever Complaint 8 , and Request for Appointment of Counsel 10 are DENIED as moot; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hardy #252393 v. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gregory Hardy #252393
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Willie O. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?