Shafer Redi-Mix, Inc. v. Teamsters
Plaintiff: Shafer Redi-Mix, Inc.
Defendant: Local 7 Teamsters
Case Number: 1:2008cv00652
Filed: July 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Office: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations Office
County: Calhoun
Presiding Judge: Judge Robert Holmes Bell
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 79 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 71 Defendant Teamsters Local 7's motion for sanctions ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
September 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 68 OPINION ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shafer Redi-Mix, Inc. v. Teamsters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shafer Redi-Mix, Inc.
Represented By: Timothy J. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Local 7 Teamsters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?