Shafer Redi-Mix, Inc. v. Teamsters
Shafer Redi-Mix, Inc. |
Local 7 Teamsters |
1:2008cv00652 |
July 9, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations Office |
Calhoun |
Judge Robert Holmes Bell |
None |
Federal Question |
28:1331 Fed. Question |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 79 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 71 Defendant Teamsters Local 7's motion for sanctions ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb) |
Filing 68 OPINION ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shafer Redi-Mix, Inc. v. Teamsters | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shafer Redi-Mix, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Timothy J. Ryan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Local 7 Teamsters | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.