Glasser v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
Petitioner: Stephen M. Glasser
Respondent: ADT Security Services, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv00223
Filed: March 12, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Office: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations Office
County: Kent
Presiding Judge: Judge Gordon J. Quist
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 29:160(1) National Labor Relations Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying preliminary injunction; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt) Modified text on 5/15/2009 (mkc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Glasser v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Stephen M. Glasser
Represented By: A. Bradley Howell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ADT Security Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?