King v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: John M. King
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2009cv00350
Filed: April 13, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Ingham
Presiding Judge: Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody
Presiding Judge: Judge Janet T. Neff
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWW)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 JUDGMENT APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 13 ; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, sas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John M. King
Represented By: Richard A. Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?