Davis v. Davis et al
Wilson Antwann Davis #12723-040 |
Unknown Davis and Attorney General of the State of Michigan |
1:2009cv00369 |
April 20, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Southern Division (1) Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Judge Robert Holmes Bell |
Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 OPINION ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb) |
Filing 21 ORDER Directing Clerk to Transfer the Action. Ordered that the Application and action shall be transfered to the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 04/16/09. (jjh, )[Transferred from Colorado on 4/20/2009.] |
Filing 12 ORDER Directing Applicant to File Amended Applicant within 30 days. Ordered that 5 is not a Motion but a supplement to the Application filed on 01/14/09 by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/26/09.(jjh, ) [Transferred from Colorado on 4/20/2009.] |
Filing 2 ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. Applicant has 30 days to file a certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement showing the current balance in his account. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/13/2009. (llk, ) [Transferred from Colorado on 4/20/2009.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.