Jones v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
| Yvette Jones |
| Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Craig Hutchinson, Dennis Straub, Mary Berghuis, George Pramstaller, Nancy Martin, Kathleen Salazar, Michael Wilkinson, Tamerla Hamilton, Renee A. VanHouten, David VanArsdale and Sherri Castenholtz |
| 1:2009cv00392 |
| April 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Calhoun |
| Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
OPINION AND ORDER overruling the Plaintiff's appeal; affirming the Magistrate's denial of Plaintiff's motions 65 regarding intervention, amendment of complaint, certification of class action, appointment of counsel, etc.; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM OPINION; signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville (Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville, mmh)
|
|
Filing
35
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER 34 granting in part and denying in part the Rule 12(c) Motion 13 for judgment on the pleadings; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 motion for summary judgment ; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
