Cage #244367 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
Harold Winfield Cage #244367 |
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia Caruso, Unknown Armstrong, Muskegon Correctional Facility, Shirlee A. Harry, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Prison Health Services, Inc. and Michael Whalen |
1:2009cv00512 |
June 4, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Southern Division (1) Office |
Muskegon |
Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney |
Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 207 JUDGMENT in favor of all defendants against Plaintiff ; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb) |
Filing 185 MEMORANDUM OPINION re discovery motions; signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville (Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville, mmh) |
Filing 98 ORDER denying 79 plf's motion to supplement complaint and to add parties defendant; signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville (Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville, mmh) |
Filing 83 ORDER denying 74 motion for reconsideration ; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb) |
Filing 9 OPINION ; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb) Modified text on 7/29/2009 (mrs). |
Filing 5 (VACATED) OPINION ; signed by Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney (Chief Judge Paul L. Maloney, aeb) Modified on 7/29/2009 to vacate per Order 8 (mrs). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.