Van Durmen #189744 v. Howes
Petitioner: Anthony Van Durmen #189744
Respondent: Carol Howes
Case Number: 1:2010cv00157
Filed: February 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Office: Southern Division (1) Office
County: Branch
Presiding Judge: Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman
Presiding Judge: Judge Robert J. Jonker
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 55 OPINION; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
March 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 24 ; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (Judge Robert J. Jonker, mil)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Van Durmen #189744 v. Howes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony Van Durmen #189744
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Carol Howes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?